Steve Harvey's stepdaughter Lori, 22, arrested for 'hit and run' after Mercedes jeep smash 'while texting and driving'

STEVE Harvey's stepdaughter has been arrested for hit and run after she crashed her Mercedes jeep while allegedly "texting and driving".

Lori, 22, was apprehended by police in Beverly Hills after the impact from the collision flipped her vehicle on Sunday.


She attempted to flee the scene after she hit a parked car but was picked-up nearby, cops claimed.

At the scene of the collision she was observed on FaceTime with her famous father Steve, an unnamed source told OK!

They also claimed that Harvey had been texting behind the wheel moments before the crash.

The accident was reported at 9.48pm on Sunday.

She was arrested for the two charges and released on scene. Not booked. She identified herself properly and signed a written promise to appear in court.

 

Harvey was charged with a misdemeanour count of hit and run and obstructing or delaying a police office.

Authorities do not believe she was intoxicated at the time of the incident.

Police said: "She was arrested for the two charges and released on scene. Not booked.

"She identified herself properly and signed a written promise to appear in court.”

SPLIT FROM P. DIDDY

Harvey was seen dining in celebrity hotspot Nobu, in Malibu, California, earlier that day with a female friend.

She and Sean Coombes, aka P. Diddy, 49, recently split-up after a three month romance.

The model shared pictures on her Instagram Story of the sunset from a beach just hours before the crash.

Lori is one of Steve's seven children.

He has been married to her mother Marjorie for 12 years.

Source: Read Full Article

For the royals, it’s starting to feel like another annus horribilis

It is starting to feel like another annus horribilis for the monarchy. First we had the allegations surrounding Prince Andrew's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. Then the Queen was dragged into a constitutional crisis over Brexit. And now the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have given a television interview that feels on a par with Diana, Princess of Wales's explosive sit-down with the BBC current affairs flagship Panorama in 1995.

Meghan Markle has discussed how it feels to be subject to the relentless UK media treatment she endures.Credit:Getty Images Europe

By appearing to suggest she can no longer continue in the royal family as it stands, the Duchess seems to be not only casting aspersions on the tabloids, but also the Firm she married into.

Her revelation to interviewer Tom Bradby that: "Not many people have asked if I'm OK," appears to hint at a lack of support among her royal relatives – echoing the criticisms Diana made to Martin Bashir in 1995 of being isolated and misunderstood.

Sources close to the Sussexes have told me that the couple feel like they are "completely on their own", which is perhaps why they have felt able in this emotional outpouring to justify breaking with the Queen's mantra: "Never explain, never complain."

As when Diana and the Prince of Wales were having marriage problems, the suggestion seems to be that no one has taken the Sussexes aside to help them deal with criticism from the press, let alone the mental anguish they claim it has caused.

Which begs the question: have the couple been receiving poor advice, or ignoring good advice? Since they did not appear to consult their advisers or closest family before, on the final day of their tour of Africa, releasing a statement attacking the press, perhaps we can deduce that it is a bit of both.

The Duke's admission that "stuff" has happened between him and his brother, who he reveals he no longer sees as much of, also bears witness to the notion that the Sussexes are increasingly operating in a silo. The Duke used to rely on brotherly advice. Since marriage, like most husbands, he now listens to his wife. Yet unlike William, Harry clearly has not fully come to terms with his mother's death, admitting his mental health needs "constant management".

Declaring that he "will not be bullied into playing the game that killed my Mum", he confirms that he does still blame the media for what happened on August 31, 1997. Many will sympathise. Others will conclude, as did the inquest, that a combination of a drunk driver and marauding paparazzi were to blame. The Duke also appears to have forgotten that at times both of his parents were willing participants in the "game" he describes.

But this was not an interview that sought to give both sides of the story. In insisting he will protect his family at all costs – backed up by the Duchess saying she will not adopt the "British stiff upper lip" – the Sussexes appear to be saying something deeper about their role. They are no longer willing to put up and shut up, which could prove problematic for a family that has traditionally kept calm and carried on.

The Duchess of Cornwall and the Duchess of Cambridge faced a relentless media backlash at first. Both rose above. Of course there is a big difference between unfair headlines and untrue ones. But this programme did not make any clearer which stories the Sussexes were objecting to and why. Some people will be scratching their heads at the Duchess's suggestion that she and her husband don't want to be seen as a "mixed race couple", but a love story. If that is the case, why does she keep bringing race into it, as when she spoke of being a "woman of colour" in South Africa? Hardly anyone else mentions it.

No one expects them to "just exist". The public wants them to "thrive and be happy". But the reaction to this programme will inevitably be divided between those who think people in positions of great power and privilege should follow the Queen's example – and those who favour Diana's.

Telegraph UK

Source: Read Full Article

Mom who ‘gloated’ about SAT cheating pleads guilty in college admissions scandal

Four more parents pleaded guilty Friday to paying bribes to get their kids into top schools as part of the college admissions scandal — including a mom who allegedly “gloated” with her daughter after the girl was fed answers to the SATs.

Elizabeth Henriquez and her Silicon Valley honcho hubby, Manuel Henriquez, pleaded guilty in Boston federal court to money laundering and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud charges for paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to William “Rick” Singer.

The college prep expert helped their two daughters cheat on their admissions tests — and also got their elder daughter, Isabelle, designated a fake athletic recruit to Georgetown University, prosecutors said.

Singer had a crooked test proctor sit “side-by-side” with Isabelle during her SATs to give her the answers, according to court documents.

Afterward, the proctor “ ‘gloated’ with Elizabeth Henriquez and her daughter about the fact that they had cheated and gotten away with it,” a criminal complaint reads.

Manuel resigned from his Silicon Valley firm, Hercules Capital, after his involvement in the scheme became public.

Douglas Hodge leaves the federal courthouse in BostonMichelle Janavs leaves the federal courthouse in Boston

View Slideshow

Source: Read Full Article

Food Stall at Urbanspace Helps Up-and-Coming Chefs

Among the scores of kiosks and stalls within the Urbanspace market halls, there’s a new one with a difference in the Vanderbilt location. Meryenda, from the chef Edie Ugot, serves Filipino dishes, like crisp and nicely spiced pork and shrimp lumpia; pancit, or glass noodles, with pork belly, sausage and vegetables; and chicken adobo over jasmine rice. Ms. Ugot is the first participant in the restaurant incubator, the Citi Test Kitchen, at this location. It’s a cooperative effort between the Citi corporation and Urbanspace to encourage new entrepreneurs with a rent-free space. Meryenda will be in residence for five months at this stall.

Meryenda, Urbanspace Vanderbilt, 45th Street and Vanderbilt Avenue, 646-747-0810, urbanspacenyc.com.

Follow NYT Food on Twitter and NYT Cooking on Instagram, Facebook and Pinterest. Get regular updates from NYT Cooking, with recipe suggestions, cooking tips and shopping advice.

Florence Fabricant is a food and wine writer. She writes the weekly Front Burner and Off the Menu columns, as well as the Pairings column, which appears alongside the monthly wine reviews. She has also written 12 cookbooks.

Source: Read Full Article

FIVE scenarios that could derail the PM's deal

FIVE scenarios that could derail the PM’s deal: JACK DOYLE analyses the problems Boris Johnson faces between now and October 31

  • MPs to vote on Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal today, with PM hopeful of a victory 
  • But Mr Johnson still faces several obstacles to get Brexit passed in nine days 
  • The obstacles include Jeremy Corbyn, Remainers MPs and the House of Lords 

On what is being dubbed ‘Titanic Tuesday’, MPs will today vote on Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal – amid growing hope of victory among Tory MPs. 

But even if Mr Johnson wins today, there is a long way to go before we can be sure Brexit will happen in nine days. 

Here, we examine the obstacles Mr Johnson faces between now and October 31.

Boris Johnson is increasingly confident of a Commons victory for his Brexit deal tomorrow

Second reading

Today MPs will vote on the second reading of the 110-page Withdrawal Agreement Bill, which was published last night. Jeremy Corbyn will whip his MPs to vote against it, as will the DUP, the Lib Dems and the Scottish Nationalists. But No 10 believes it has won back almost all the hardline Brexiteers who killed off Theresa May’s deal as well as Tory Remain rebels, and has enough votes from Labour leavers and independents to get it over the line. If the vote is lost, the deal is effectively dead and with it any hope of getting out of the EU by the end of the month.

Timetable vote

The second of today’s two votes, but potentially the more important, because it will set out the timetable for debates and votes on the Bill. Ministers will try their utmost to drive the Bill through in time for October 31, and want the Commons stages completed by Thursday, by means of two midnight sittings today and tomorrow. But opposition MPs – and some Tory rebels – will demand more time for debate. If they get it, it will be all but impossible to leave in nine days.

Customs union

The most dangerous of the Labour amendments. Mr Corbyn will try to force the UK to stay in a post-Brexit customs union, which would make free trade deals all but impossible. A similar proposal in April lost by only three votes. Downing Street aides have made it clear they will not swallow a customs union – the issue on which Mr Johnson quit Mrs May’s government – and suggest such an amendment would kill the Bill. With Tory rebels backing away from the idea yesterday, the vote will hinge on the actions of the DUP, SNP and Labour leavers.

However, even if it goes through, the PM will still face several challenges to pass it nine days, with Jeremy Corbyn also likely to push for a second referendum

Second referendum

A lurking threat. Mr Corbyn will attach a second referendum amendment to the Bill, proposing a delay until the country has been put through the trauma of a second vote. If it passes, Mr Johnson will have to abandon the Bill and – in the short term – Brexit. But despite the determined efforts of Remain campaigners, the Commons has never voted for a second referendum, and there seems little prospect of a majority emerging at this stage.

House of Lords

If the deal survives the Commons, this could be the real danger zone. With a large number of Remainer peers, the Lords can be expected to try to throw a spanner in the works with amendments, as well as backing second referendum and customs union amendments if they come from the Commons. The question is whether, when it comes to the crunch, unelected peers would defy a majority in the Commons – and the referendum result – and try to block Brexit.

Source: Read Full Article

Black World War I soldier receives recognition decades after death

Fox News Flash top headlines for Oct. 21

Fox News Flash top headlines for Oct. 21 are here. Check out what’s clicking on Foxnews.com

A black World War I soldier was finally recognized for his military service over the weekend, decades after he was buried in an unmarked grave in Indiana.

Leonard Inman was interred at the Spring Vale Cemetery in Lafayette following his death in 1973.

The General de Lafayette Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution helped get a headstone for Inman after discovering his name in the 1919 Tippecanoe County World War I Honor Roll book, the Lafayette Journal & Courier reported.

“We just can’t let his memory be forgotten,” said Diana Vice, the chapter’s vice regent. “I just think that we need to honor them. (African American soldiers are) relegated to the back of this history book in 1919. I felt like he deserved one, and his memory needs to be kept alive and honored for his service and sacrifice.”

Vice said she discovered Inman didn't have a headstone after she found his name with those of 17 other black soldiers who served in the war from Tippecanoe County. She contacted the county’s Veterans Services office, which paid for the marker.

A memorial featuring a posting of colors, a 21-gun salute and the retiring of colors and taps by a local American Legion Post was held for Inman on Saturday. Vice told The Associated Press prior to the ceremony that Inman's relative from Nevada had flown out for the tribute.

Messages to the Lafayette chapter of the  Daughters of the American Revolution were not immediately returned.

Inman was born in 1893 in Knoxville, Tenn., and served in the 809th Pioneer Infantry, Company C. He enlisted in the military 10 years after moving with his family to Lafayette, Ind., in 1908.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The armed forces weren't desegregated until 1948, meaning Inman likely served under French command, according to the chapter's research. Black soldiers were not allowed to directly engage in combat at the time.

After his military service, Inman returned to Lafayette. He died Nov. 25, 1973 from an apparent heart attack. He had no children.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source: Read Full Article

Donald Trump calls the emoluments clause 'PHONY'

Donald Trump calls the emoluments clause ‘PHONY’ saying George Washington had a business too as he explodes over being forced to ditch holding the G7 at his Doral resort and claims being president has cost him $5 BILLION

  • Donald Trump flew off the handle Monday when reporters again asked about his proposal to hold the 2020 G7 summit at his Doral, Florida resort
  • ‘You people with this phony Emoluments Clause,’ Trump said when defending the potential for him to be enriched through his office 
  • He mentioned that George Washington continued to conduct business when he was president
  • Trump made a U-turn Saturday on his using the Trump-branded property for the event
  • Abrupt decision came after call to Camp David where middle-of-the-road GOP senators were meeting with acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney 
  • The ‘consensus’ among that group was that Trump should abandon his plan 
  • Political moderates could be swing-votes in any impeachment trial that might reach the Senate
  • Trump recast the decision on Monday as a response to Democrats and reporters, rather than a political necessity to fend off an impeachment conviction 
  • Mulvaney said Sunday that he and Trump were surprised at the level of pushback 

Donald Trump lashed out as questions were again brought up on Monday surrounding his decision to propose his Florida resort be the site for the 2020 Group of Seven summit.

He lambasted the media and called the emoluments clause ‘phony’ when defending his proposal, which he reversed Saturday, to hold next year’s G7 at a Trump-branded property.

‘You people with this phony Emoluments Clause,’ Trump dismissed while speaking to reporters following a cabinet meeting Monday, claiming he doesn’t need to use the presidency to ‘promote’ his business.

The Emoluments Clause is a constitutional provision that prohibits presidents and other members of the federal government from using their office to enrich themselves or their personal businesses.

He also brought up past presidents who have run businesses or engaged in business dealings while president.

‘I don’t know if you know it. George Washington – he ran his business simultaneously while he was president,’ Trump cited.

Donald Trump blasted the emoluments clause as ‘phony’ as he insisted his personal business would not be enriched if the 2020 Group of Seven summit were held at his Doral, Florida resort

Trump defended his person business, by giving a few examples of other presidents who still ran businesses from office – including the first U.S. President George Washington. ‘George Washington, they say, had two desks. He had a presidential desk and a business desk,’ Trump said

WHAT IS THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE?

Also known as the Title of Nobility Clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution was created to shield federal officeholders from foreign influences. It also prohibits the federal government from granting titles of nobility and restricts members of government from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states without the consent of the United States Congress.  

It’s the reason that America has no lords, knights or dukes. 

Text: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. 

‘There weren’t too many really rich presidents, but there were a few – they ran their business,’ he continued.

‘George Washington was actually considered a very, very rich man at the time,’ he said. ‘George Washington, they say, had two desks. He had a presidential desk and a business desk.’

George Washington was thought to be richest U.S. president before Trump was elected. Just the value of his estate and plantation in 1799 was worth $1 million, which in 2018 would translate to $20 million.

He had an estimated net worth of $525 million in today’s dollars and owned over 50,000 acres of land. His salary in 1789 was 2 per cent of the total U.S. budget. 

‘Hey, Obama made a deal for a book. Is that running a business?’ Trump said in his Monday remarks, inciting his Democratic predecessor. ‘He has a deal with Netflix? When did they start talking about that? That’s only, you know, a couple of examples.’

Trump insisted he would have allowed the G7 to be held at the Trump National Doral Miami resort ‘for nothing,’ and claims it would have been the cheapest and most secure option for the U.S.

‘The Democrats went crazy, even though I would have done it free. Saved the country a lot of money,’ Trump said in a rant to reporters. ‘Then they say, ‘Oh, but you’ll get promotion.’ Who cares? You don’t think I get enough promotion? I get more promotion than any human being that’s ever lived.’

‘I don’t need promotion,’ he continued.

Trump insisted that being president has actually lost him between $2-$5 billion, but said if he could choose, he would do it all over again ‘in an instant.’

‘Who cares? If you can afford it, what difference does it make?’ he said. ‘If you’re rich, it doesn’t matter.’

Trump donates his salary each quarter to support a specific government program.

His company, the Trump Organization, writes a six-figure check to the U.S. Treasury every year equal to what it says is its profit from transactions involving foreign governments. A company source said the Doral G7 would have followed the same guideline.

Trump took his Florida country club off the short list of locations for the G7 after Republican senators who will sit in judgment if he’s impeached said they didn’t like it.

He blamed Democrats and reporters on Monday instead.

‘Doral in Miami would have been the best place to hold the G-7, and free, but too much heat from the Do Nothing Radical Left Democrats & their Partner, the Fake News Media!’ the president tweeted. ‘I’m surprised that they allow me to give up my $400,000 Plus Presidential Salary! We’ll find someplace else!’ 

The president donates his salary each quarter to support a specific government program. His company, the Trump Organization, writes a six-figure check to the U.S. Treasury every year equal to what it says is its profit from transactions involving foreign governments. A company source said the Doral G7 would have followed the same guideline. 

Last week Trump said his Doral resort near Miami, Florida would host the 2020 G7 summit, only to reverse course after hearing that moderate Republican senators – whose impeachment votes he would need to keep his job – wouldn’t back him

‘I think we were all surprised at the level of pushback,’ Mulvaney said of the bipartisan criticism over the potential conflicts of interest with the president the event at one of his properties

The president vented Monday on Twitter, blaming Democrats and the media for forcing him into a decision that he made after hearing moderate Republicans didn’t like it

After watching Fox News Channel luminaries trash his choice on Friday, Trump called Camp David where acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney was meeting with middle-of-the-road congressional Republicans on Saturday, for discussions about a range of issues including Syria, trade and impeachment.

The consensus, Mulvaney told him, was that he should cancel his Florida plans, The New York Times reported. The senators in the room were moderates who could be swing votes in any impeachment tally. In order to remove Trump from office, Democrats would need 20 of them to abandon him.

Hours later the president tweeted an announcement: He would find a Plan B. 

The group told Mulvaney and other aides that a G7 at Doral ‘would be a distraction,’ according to New York Republican Rep. Peter King. A Senate aide told DailyMail.com that some in the room at Camp David griped that they couldn’t support the president’s play at Trump-branding an international diplomatic meeting. 

Mulvaney said the following morning that Trump was genuinely surprised at the intensity of the objections.

‘At the end of the day he still considers himself to be in the hospitality business,’ He said on Fox News Sunday, ‘and he saw an opportunity to take the biggest leaders from around the world and he wanted to put on the absolute best show, the best visit that he possibly could, and he was very comfortable doing that at Doral.’

‘I think we were all surprised at the level of pushback,’ he continued. ‘I think it’s the right decision to change and we’ll have to find someplace else and my guess is we’ll find someplace else the media won’t like for another reason.’

When host Chris Wallace pushed back that the president was no longer in hospitality and was now serving as president, Mulvaney dismissed it.

‘Yeah, but it’s his background,’ Mulvaney said, adding, ‘he’s in the hotel business, or at least he was before he was president.’

The White House announced Thursday that Trump sought to host next year’s Group of Seven economic summit of developed world leaders at the Trump National Doral golf resort.

Mulvaney told reporters at the time that the summit would take place at the Trump property on June 10-12, 2020, calling it ‘the perfect physical location to do this.’

He also told reporters in the White House press briefing room Thursday that the move would be ‘vastly cheaper’ than other places and that there should be no concerns that Trump would personally profit from the summit.

‘There’s no issue here on him profiting from this in any way, shape or form,’ Mulvaney said.

The announcement received widespread backlash with claims of potential conflicts of interest between the president and his personal business.

Saturday morning, just two days after announcing the summit would be held at the Doral resort, Trump announced that this would not longer be the location for the U.S. hosting world leaders next year.

He blamed the ‘media and democrat crazed and irrational hostility’ for the quick reversal – even though he received criticism even from within his own party. 

 

Trump argued Doral would be ‘vastly cheaper’ than any other location and Mulvaney said the president would not be ‘profiting from this in any way, shape or form’

‘We will begin the search for another site, including the possibility of Camp David, immediately. Thank you!’ Trump said, bemoaning that the White House would ‘no longer consider’ his branded property for the G7.

Trump’s U-turn came just 30 minutes after he tweeted his reasoning for wanting to host the summit on his own grounds.

‘I thought I was doing something very good for our Country by using Trump National Doral, in Miami, for hosting the G-7 Leaders,’ he tweeted before the reversal.

‘It is big, grand, on hundreds of acres, next to MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, has tremendous ballrooms & meeting rooms, and each delegation would have its own 50 to 70 unit building. Would set up better than other alternatives,’ he continued.

‘I announced that I would be willing to do it at NO PROFIT or, if legally permissible, at ZERO COST to the USA. But, as usual, the Hostile Media & their Democrat Partners went CRAZY!’ he concluded.

Mulvaney said that he and Trump discussed the move and the bipartisan hit the president took for the decision to put Doral on the short list.

‘He was honestly surprised at the level of pushback,’ Mulvaney said of the president. 

Mulvaney’s defense of the president comes as reports emerge that there was an internal effort in the White House to push out the acting chief of staff – an effort that was put on hold as the impeachment inquiry commenced.

A source familiar with Mulvaney’s thinking said the acting chief of staff is looking for an exit, but other people close with Mulvaney contradict this claim, insisting he does not want to leave.

He has also come under fire for essentially admitting during a press briefing this week that the president set a quid pro quo with Ukraine – the main charge Democrats cite for the impeachment proceedings.

Trump has vehemently denied that he set a quid pro quo and says his call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky over the summer was ‘perfect.’ Zelesnky has also claimed he did not feel pressure or ‘blackmailed’ into probing Biden and his son, Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine.

However, during his news conference Thursday, Mulvaney said the U.S. requested Ukraine assist in the investigation into the handling of the Democratic National Committee server that was hacked in 2016 – and then insinuated that was the reason the administration decided to withhold funds from Ukraine.

‘That’s why we held up the money,’ Mulvaney said Thursday afternoon after listing the 2016-related investigation and Trump’s broader concerns about corruption in Ukraine.

Mulvaney has denied admitting a quid pro quo.

Mulvaney was head of the Office of Management and Budget, a post he took a month after Trump’s inauguration, and has never officially left that role as he assumed the acting position he now holds in the White House.

He took over as acting chief of staff after retired Marine Corps General John Kelly resigned from the post as chief of staff in January of this year.

Source: Read Full Article

Moment cat gets trapped in a vase – forcing owner to SMASH ornament

Pets will drive you potty! Moment cat gets trapped in a vase – forcing its owner to SMASH the ornament to free it

  • Rattaporn Saringkarn, 26, from southern Thailand, found his pet stuck in the pot
  • His mother, Somchit, had to smash open the garden pot with a wooden pestle 
  • The three-year-old female Siemese cat named Ploy was able to scamper away

This is the moment a woman had to smash open a pot to rescue her fat cat who was had accidentally got stuck inside.

Rattaporn Saringkarn, 26, from Surat Thani in southern Thailand, found his pet Siamese cat named Ploy stuck in the large ceramic pot at his home.

Footage from last Thursday shows how Rattaporn’s mother, Somchit, had to smash open the garden pot with a wooden pestle to release Ploy. 

Rattaporn Saringkarn, 26, from Surat Thani in southern Thailand, found his pet Siamese cat named Ploy (pictured) stuck in the large ceramic pot at his home

Rattaporn’s mother, Somchit, had to smash open the garden pot with a wooden pestle (pictured) to release Ploy

The three-year-old female non-pedigree cat was then able to scamper away.

The woman hits the pot in the middle a few times before it smashes in half and then the cat sticks its head through the top.

They then lift the debris off her so she can get away, as they voice their relief.  

Rattaporn said that the mischievous cat was her usual calm self after the incident, unaware of the damage that she caused by making them smash the valuable garden pot.

The woman hits the pot in the middle a few times before it smashes in half and then the cat sticks its head through the top (pictured)

Ploy was her usual calm self after the incident (pictured), unaware of the damage that she caused by making them smash the valuable garden pot

He said: ‘She found the pot cozy then entered it, but I found her struggling to get out. We tried to pull her out but it was impossible because of her big belly.’

‘Finally, my mother had to smash the pot to get her out. After she was freed she went on walking around in the house like nothing had happened.’

Source: Read Full Article

Babysitter, 21, caught on nanny cam kicking five-month-old twins

Babysitter, 21, caught on nanny cam kicking five-month-old twins and covering their mouths to stifle their cries is sentenced to just a MONTH in jail

  • McKenna Newell, 21, of West Valley City, will severe 30 days in jail and spend 36 months on probation after pleading guilty to a reduced count of child abuse
  • As part of her sentence she will also be forced to pay a fine of $5,000, complete 500 hours of community service and attend anger management classes
  • Newell is seen in the video putting a blanket over one of the twins’ faces to muffle her cries. She shakes the infant before placing her back down
  • When the child starts to cry again, Newell kicks her in the ribs and hits her legs, before administering the same vile attack on the other of the girls
  • After turning herself into authorities, Newell told investigators she was ‘frustrated and didn’t know what to do,’ and didn’t remember attacking the girls
  • Shortly after her arrest, Newell was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and ‘was actively engaged in treatment,’ counselors said 

McKenna Newell, 21, of West Valley City, will severe 30 days in jail and spend 36 months on probation after pleading guilty to a reduced count of child abuse, a court heard earlier this month

A Utah babysitter who was caught on nanny cam kicking, hitting and covering the mouths and noses of five-month-old twins was sentenced to just a month behind bars for the vile abuse.

McKenna Newell, 21, of West Valley City, will serve 30 days in jail and spend 36 months on probation after pleading guilty to a reduced count of child abuse, a court heard earlier this month.

As part of her sentence she will also be forced to pay a fine of $5,000, complete 500 hours of community service and attend anger management classes.

A warrant for her arrest was first issued on January 5 after the children’s father saw footage of Newell attacking his two girls on a nanny camera that he’d set up in his home.

According to court documents, Newell is seen in the video putting a blanket over one of the twins’ faces to muffle her cries. She then picks up and shakes the infant before placing her back down in a crib.

Moments later, she removes the baby, holds her until she stops crying, and then places her down on the floor next to her sister.

When the child starts to cry again, Newell kicks her in the ribs and hits her legs, before administering the same vile attack on the other of the girls.

According to court documents, Newell is seen in the video putting a blanket over one of the twins’ faces to muffle her cries. She then picks up and shakes the infant before placing her back down in a crib

Footage from the same morning showed Newell putting the infant on the couch and ‘aggressively causing her head to bounce forward,’ and kicking the other baby ‘several times as she laid on the floor,’ prosecutors said.

After turning herself into authorities, Newell told investigators she was ‘frustrated and didn’t know what to do,’ admitting she was the nanny in the video but felt embarrassed and didn’t remember committing the violent acts.

Shortly after her arrest, Newell was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and ‘was actively engaged in treatment, communicating honestly, taking notes and completing homework assigned to her,’ according to counselors.

West Jordan Police Sergeant JC Holt said: ‘It’s our worst fear as a parent that something like that would happen to your child, especially with somebody you know that you’ve left that child in their care.

‘She lost her patience. She didn’t deal with it in a healthy manner. I think that all of us as adults, we can be susceptible to that at times.

‘It’s not excusable and it’s not okay, that’s why we handled the case the way that we did.’

Holt said the children were not seriously hurt in the incident and were checked out at Primary Children’s Hospital before being medically cleared.

Newell’s actions warranted felony charges because of the potential for serious bodily harm, he explained.

After turning herself into authorities, Newell told investigators she was ‘frustrated and didn’t know what to do,’ admitting she was the nanny in the video but felt embarrassed and didn’t remember committing the violent acts

She received the sentence of a 30 day jail term and three years probation on October 3.

Newell wasn’t in custody at the time of the hearing and she was ordered to report to the Salt Lake County Jail by October 11 to commence her sentence.

She had originally been charged with two counts of child abuse, but saw one of the charges dropped as part of a plea deal with prosecutors.

Newell advertised her babysitting services through Care.com, though the website said in a previous statement that they closed her account in January, just after she was charged.

A spokesperson told Fox13: ‘This incident is deeply disturbing to us and our thoughts are with the family. The individual in question did have a profile on Care.com which has now been closed but we do not employ the caregivers on our site and she is not, nor has she ever been, an employee of Care.com. 

‘The safety of our community is of paramount importance to use and we have proactively reached out to local law enforcement to provide whatever assistance we can.’  

Source: Read Full Article

Thai king strips ‘disloyal’ royal mistress of titles

Thailand’s king has stripped his royal mistress of her titles and military ranks for being “disloyal” and trying to undermine the queen.

Sineenat Wongvajirapakdi, 34, had breached a code of conduct for courtiers and was disloyal to the king, a palace statement said.

The eccentric King Maha Vajiralongkon, known as Rama X, made his former bodyguard the royal noble consort at the end of July.

Her elevation made her the first person to be named as a royal noble consort in almost a century.

The 67-year-old ruler married his fourth wife, Queen Suthida, two months before making his mistress an official concubine during a televised service, with his wife sitting next to him.

But on Monday the palace released a two-page statement branding Sineenat, known as Koi, “ungrateful” and behaving “in ways unbecoming of her title”.

“She is also not content with the title bestowed upon her, doing everything to rise to the level of the queen,” it added.

Sineenat had opposed Suthida’s appointment and wanted to be named queen herself, the statement said.

It called her “ambitious” in trying to obtain royal titles and “self-promoting” in her royal activities.

“She lacks the understanding of the good traditions of the royal court. She displays disobedience against the king and the queen,” the palace said.

Thailand enforces lese majeste – a law which makes it illegal to defame, insult or threaten the monarchy, with punishment of three to 15 years in prison.

It is not known if Sineenat’s behaviour will be covered by the law, however she has been stripped of her four medals she received during her consort ceremony, including the “most noble order of the crown of Thailand”.

The former army nurse also is no longer a major general in the Thai army where she was the king’s personal bodyguard before becoming his consort.

King Rama X’s marriage to Queen Suthida, known as Nui, was a surprise as although they had been linked romantically for years the palace had never acknowledged their relationship before announcing they were getting married in May.

A former Thai Airways flight attendant, the queen was also in his bodyguard unit, where she was a deputy commander and a full general in the Royal Thai Army.

The king became a monarch after his highly respected father, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, died in 2016 after 70 years on the throne.

However, he was only officially crowned in May after requesting time to mourn before taking the throne.

Months before his coronation he was pictured at Munich airport wearing a crop top and fake tattoo sleeves while Queen Suthida also wore a belly top and carried a poodle.

The king, who was educated in the UK and Australia, has long been the focus of gossip in Thailand and abroad, although media in the country will not publish the stories due to lese majeste.

In 2009 a home video was released by WikiLeaks showing the then-crown prince next to his third wife who was only wearing a thong as she pretended to eat from a dog bowl as they celebrated the prince’s poodle’s birthday with servants.

Fufu the dog held the rank of Air Chief Marshal in the Royal Thai Air Force, with the poodle appearing at official functions dressed in a dinner jacket.

Branded a womaniser by his own mother, Queen Sirikit, the king has been married four times and has 10 children, although only seven are officially recognised by him.

:: Sky News is broadcasting a Brexit-free channel, weekdays 5pm to 10pm on Sky 523

Source: Read Full Article